The Client on the Brink of Estrangement

Two Clinical Responses to the Question of Cutoffs

Magazine Issue
July/August 2026
Share
The top half of a man looks over at the bottom half of his body as it walks away

Enjoy the audio preview version of this article—perfect for listening on the go.

Owen is a 28-year-old new father who starts his first session with you by leaning close to his webcam and whispering, “My parents were supposed to visit for a few days, and they’ve been here three weeks. I’ve tried setting boundaries since I got sober three years ago, but it doesn’t work. I think I need to break away from them once and for all.”

When you ask what’s been happening, he describes his parents creating chaos in his marriage. His mom finagled her way into the delivery room, which his wife Cynthia, a lawyer born in El Salvador, hasn’t forgiven. And most mornings, his dad listens to super conservative Christian talk shows that vilify immigrants while Cynthia tries to feed the baby in the next room.

Owen reports, “I’ve told my dad I’m working on myself and want to find ways we can all respect each other and get along, but he just says things like, ‘Therapy is just brainwashing you’ and ‘If your wife respected us, she’d be more welcoming to us and more willing to put her career aside for the sake of our grandson.’”

Taking a breath, he adds, “My last therapist suggested I cut off contact with them, and I told her I’d never do that. But the more I think about it, the more it seems like the only real option.” He hesitates. “I know they love me. But they’re making my life hell.”

Find Your Own Center

By Matthias Barker & Jag Gill

I can see the tension in Owen’s forehead, his searching eyes, his sunken chin. He’s hunched over, leaning against the arm of the couch as if he’s looking for something solid to press against. I feel the pull in my own chest to lean in, reassure him, tell him what to do.

That pull is worth paying attention to, because it’s almost certainly what everyone in Owen’s life has been feeling around him for years. His parents tell him what to do. His previous therapist told him what to do. Now he’s essentially asking me what to do.

Maybe that’s the deeper problem here.

He didn’t stop his mother at the delivery room door, although he wanted to. He’s whispering to me from behind a closed door in his own home, three weeks into his parents’ most recent visit, which he hasn’t yet ended. And when his previous therapist suggested cutting contact with them, he said he’d never do that—then showed up here reconsidering it. Each of these moments has the same shape: a situation that calls for Owen to act from his own values and results in him feeling unable to move.

My intuition is that this isn’t just a conflict with his parents. It’s a war inside him—a wrestling match between two valid parts of his identity, two sets of values that have yet to be differentiated and reintegrated. One part of him still strongly identifies with his family of origin. And then there’s the emergent part: husband, father, co-head of a household with different ways of holding gender roles, decision-making, trust, and agency. When those two parts push him in opposite directions with equal force, the result isn’t movement. It’s stasis. What looks like inaction may be paralysis.

I also find myself curious about Cynthia—and not only because of the harm she’s absorbed. She’s navigated something relevant here. Growing up in El Salvador, building a life across cultures, continuing her career while becoming a mother, she’s likely already done some version of the differentiation work Owen is facing now. How did she integrate her heritage with her identity as an adult? How have she and Owen worked through that together as a couple? Have they even discussed it?

Sociologist Rin Reczek uses the term democratized kinship to describe the framework that many young couples like Owen and Cynthia have acculturated into—one in which family bonds derive their legitimacy not from blood or role, but from ongoing mutual respect, accountability, emotional safety, and chosen investment. Owen has likely been drifting in this direction for years. It’s the natural current of a secularizing Western culture, one where personal autonomy and coming to an authentic understanding of the self take priority over complying with family expectations.

This democratized kinship framework affects not just bicultural families like Cynthia’s but culturally homogenous families like Owen’s, ones living in rural, religious, or otherwise traditional environments. Therapy and recovery may have pushed Owen further and faster than he would have traveled on his own, but he may still have one foot in his parents’ world, and that’s exactly the kind of internal dynamic that produces paralysis. “Setting limits” feels both right and wrong at the same time.

When Owen says he wants to “find ways we can all respect each other,” he doesn’t seem to realize that he and his father have fundamentally different conceptual frameworks built around that single word: respect. For Owen’s father, someone operating from a patriarchal, role-based framework, respect isn’t negotiated and reciprocal. It’s hierarchical. Owen’s father isn’t overreaching when he instructs his daughter-in-law to leave her career. He may mean it as an act of guidance and stewardship, a patriarch doing right by his family. When Owen talks about mutual respect, his father hears a challenge to the natural order, and perhaps even to his value or identity within the family. They aren’t speaking the same language.

These themes need careful handling, and I know I need to pace myself. Explaining to Owen his father’s cultural logic can easily start to sound like defending it, which will only deepen his guilt and experience of paralysis. But understanding is not excusing, so making visible what’s been operating invisibly—giving Owen a map of the collision he’s already inside—may be exactly what the work requires.

His previous therapist’s recommendation to cut contact was a surface fix to what may be a deeper problem. Estrangement won’t resolve what’s unresolved inside him. If my read is correct, he’ll carry this same tension and paralysis into his marriage, his relationship with his children, and every future moment that asks him to act from his own center.

The immediate priorities are practical: Owen’s parents need to leave, conjoint sessions with Cynthia are indicated, and his sobriety infrastructure needs direct attention. But underneath the practical work is something deeper. Owen needs to finish the process of understanding what he actually believes about how a household is governed, who he is with his wife, what kind of environment his son will grow up in, and who he is in the face of his father’s expectations.

When those values are genuinely his own, chosen rather than vaguely inherited, he can begin negotiating his relationship with his parents from solid ground. The results of that negotiation will likely determine the kind of relationship that’s possible with his parents.

And the conversations leading up to it will likely be more direct than his parents are used to and require Owen to speak in a language they can recognize. Not a list of boundaries or “I feel” statements, but language that leads with relationship and what’s best for the collective. Something like: “I want to talk about visits in a way that honors my wife and our family. Let’s pick dates now so I can protect that time for us. Also, I found an Airbnb close by. Tell me what you think. While I love having you stay, this will best serve my wife as she settles into these early days with a newborn. I’m genuinely looking forward to time together.”

That kind of language won’t eliminate the tension, and his parents may still push back, but it’s far more likely to land than democratized kinship vocabulary like “this is my boundary,” which his parents will experience as their son pushing away the family, rather than finding ways of establishing healthy closeness.

The goal isn’t to help Owen find the right answer about his parents, or even to help him set boundaries in a way that won’t upset them. It’s to help him become someone who can act from his own center and tolerate the result: good or bad.

Set Limits First

By Joshua Coleman

There are a number of parental behaviors here that increase the risk of eventual estrangement as an outcome for this family. Owen’s mother and father seem unable to abide by their agreement to only visit for three days and have now stayed three weeks. Owen hasn’t enforced the limits they agreed on. He’s in recovery and needs to protect that. His mother has acted in a way that disrespected his wife during the birth of her child. His father listens to talk radio vilifying immigrants, knowing Cynthia is an immigrant herself, and demeans his therapy.

Any one of those actions on the part of the parents could trigger an estrangement today.

What to do?

I’d start by exploring why it’s so hard for Owen to enforce the limits he’s already set. I assume there’s nothing new or unusual in the self-centered way that the parents are behaving both toward him and his wife. From that perspective, he likely has years of experiencing his feelings as not mattering to them. In addition, he believes—perhaps correctly—that if he tries to assert himself, he’ll be shamed, humiliated, or rejected in the process.

But he’s no longer a child and needs to stop giving his parents so much power.

If the agreement was that mom and dad were only going to stay three days, then they need to get out after day three and not one day more.

Should he cut them off?

Estrangement should be the last decision on the decision tree—and he has a long way to go before such an action makes sense.

Here’s what he should say instead, either directly or in a letter:

Mom and Dad, I love you both and am very grateful for the positive ways that you’ve contributed to my life. However, we need to have a very different kind of relationship going forward.

Mom, my wife made it clear that she didn’t want you in the delivery room, and you went anyway. I get that it’s your first grandchild and you wanted to be there. And I can see how you might’ve felt hurt or rejected that she didn’t want you there. But this was her decision to make, and by not respecting it, you treated an important event in her life like she and her feelings didn’t matter.

She’s too nice to tell you that herself, and I’m not confident you’d be sufficiently respectful or apologetic if she did, which is why I’m telling you. I’d like you to apologize to her for what you did and to commit to being more careful in the future.

In addition, you both said you were only going to stay here for three days, and it’s now been three weeks. I hate having conflict with you, so I haven’t really raised it. Perhaps that’s why you assumed that I was more okay with it than I am. But the visit has gone on too long. In the future, if we have an agreement about how long you’re going to stay, I’d like you to keep your word and not put me in the uncomfortable position of having to kick you out. It’s not my nature, and I don’t like hurting your feelings.

In that vein, I’d like you to start being more sensitive to my feelings. I get that you’ve never had therapy and think it’s some kind of weak indulgence. But I’ve benefited a lot from it. It’s helpful to my recovery. And I don’t want to hear any more about why you think it’s bullshit. You’re welcome to your opinions, I just don’t want to hear them again.

Finally, Dad, my wife is an immigrant and I love her. She’s also the mother of your grandchild. It’s incredibly disrespectful and hurtful to both her and me for you to listen to programs in our home that vilifies immigrants. Do what you want in your own home but not in mine.

I’m sure this is a lot, as you’re not used to me pushing back on you in this way. Over the years, I’ve learned that it’s easier to get along with you both if I don’t, but I’m at a very different place in my life now.

The therapy that follows the delivery of this message would be based on how willing and able Owen is to enforce those limits with his parents and on how much resistance he gets from them.

Estrangements sometimes occur prematurely because the client doesn’t have the strength or support to enforce the limits they set without collapsing under guilt or fear. While estrangement is always an option, supporting it prematurely denies clients the opportunity to develop the kind of resilience and musculature that will carry over into their other relationships.

In addition, there are several other problems with recommending or supporting estrangement at this stage. Since Owen is obviously conflict avoidant, acting like the parents are hopeless before he’s faced them with his limits is unfair to them. They likely have always assumed he was a good-natured guy who isn’t bothered by whatever it is that’s actually bothering him. From that perspective, they’ll need some time to get up to speed with the new assertive him, which will require patience from Owen and Cynthia.

While estrangement can sometimes and reasonably be cast as a virtuous act of self-care, it can also reflect an unwillingness or inability to do the hard work of communicating needs and feelings when the outcome is uncertain. We do a disservice to our clients when we make it all about the parent’s inability to change without considering how able or willing the client is to learn to communicate more effectively, set limits, and take risks.

Matthias Barker

Matthias Barker, LMHC, is a psychotherapist and founder of Estrangement.com, an online psychoeducation and support program for parents and adult children navigating long-term family disconnection. He’s widely recognized as one of the most followed voices on family estrangement in the world, reaching an audience of over four million people across social media platforms. He is currently conducting research on the patterns and pathways to healing that have emerged from his work with families and is writing a book on the subject. He lives in Nashville with his wife and three children.

Jag Gill

Jag Gill is a doctoral student in Clinical Psychology whose research focuses on parent-child estrangement. His work explores how parents and adult children cope with family disconnection, the pathways through which they reconnect, and the broader cultural, relational, and intrapersonal dynamics that contribute to its rise. His work bridges the lived experience of relational rupture with clinical approaches that support meaningful repair and healing on both sides of the divide.

Joshua Coleman

Joshua Coleman, PhD, is a clinical psychologist in the Bay Area, keynote speaker, author and senior fellow with the Council on Contemporary Families. His newest book is Rules of Estrangement: Why Adult Children Cut Ties and How to Heal the Conflict. His Substack is Family Troubles.