Neuroplasticity Isn’t Always for the Best
Why Therapists Should Know about the Plastic Paradox
Norman Doidge, psychiatrist and author of the bestselling book The Brain That Changes Itself, has spent the last 14 years exploring how to integrate recent discoveries in brain science into psychotherapeutic practice. Doidge believes that while the brain has an astonishing capacity for change, brain plasticity doesn’t always work out for the best.
“If you do something that’s good for you, the circuitry will fire faster, stronger, and more clearly,” Doidge says. “Over time, it’ll take up more cortical real estate and become your default circuitry. But it’s also true that if you repeatedly do something that’s bad for you, the same thing happens. The plastic paradox accounts for both our flexibility when we choose to do something for the first time as well as our symptomatic rigidity.”
Probably nobody has made a stronger case for the truth of the old adage “use it or lose it,” or argued more convincingly for routinely considering the power of plasticity in day-to-day psychotherapy.
As he puts it in this brief video clip, “I tell patients that neuroplasticity is like snow. The first time you go skiing down a mountain with fresh snow on it, you can take almost any path you want, as long as there aren’t any trees or rocks in your way. But if you had a good run the first time, the next run tends to be very close to that one. Eventually, if you keep it up, you’ll develop tracks in the snow that become harder and harder to get out of. Each time you do the thing that’s bad for you, like go into another relationship with someone who treats you in a demeaning way, you’re going to deepen that pattern.”