Clinician's Digest


A Therapeutic Game Changer?

July/August 2011


Researchers like Michael Lambert and the late Ken Howard have proven that therapists who receive structured feedback from or about clients after each session have fewer premature terminations and stronger therapy alliances—factors that generally lead to more successful therapy outcomes. To assist this process, clinician–researchers such as Lambert, Scott Miller, and Barry Duncan have developed short questionnaires for clients to complete, providing quick snapshots of the therapeutic progress at every session. But the brevity of these questionnaires may also be a limitation.

Such forms focus on one or two dimensions of therapy—the alliance and/or how clients assess their own progress—mere snippets of one client’s subjective experience. Longer forms could give therapists much more information about what’s really happening in therapy. However, since few therapists take the time to use even the short forms already available, preferring to rely on their own instincts, perceptions, and emotionally charged clinical moments, it seems a stretch to suppose they’d welcome longer questionnaires.

What if there were a multidimensional feedback system that took clients just five to seven minutes to fill out, covered more of the complexities of therapy, had a systemic perspective, fed the information to therapists in user-friendly graphs on the Internet that required just a couple of minutes to examine, and revealed information not always apparent in sessions? Family…

Already have an account linked to your magazine subscription? Log in now to continue reading this article.

(Need help? Click here or contact us to ask a question.)

Not currently a subscriber? Subscribe Today to read the rest of this article!




Read 32926 times
Comments - (existing users please login first)
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *
E-mail Address *
Website URL
Message *
1 Comment

Friday, July 27, 2012 3:54:14 AM | posted by 877 reverse phone lookup
I must say, as a lot as I enjoyed reading what you had to say, I couldnt help on the other hand lose interest after a while.
It is because if you had a excellent grasp to the subject matter,
but you forgot to include your readers. Perhaps you'll want to think about this from far more than one angle. Or maybe you shouldnt generalise so considerably. Its better whenever you think about what others may have to say instead of just heading for a gut reaction to that the subject. Think about adjusting your own thought process and giving others who may read this the benefit of the doubt.

livechat