Point of View

Point of View

Therapy and the Limitations of Mindfulness

By Ryan Howes

May/June 2018

Ask most therapists today what they’d suggest for a client with anxiety and you’re likely to hear a combination of techniques anchored by a mindfulness practice. But for psychiatrist and bestselling author Mark Epstein, a state of mindfulness isn’t just a prescription for quieting an anxious mind: it’s an introductory phase to a much deeper process of healing and enlightenment.

Epstein, a contemporary of Buddhist psychologists Ram Dass and Jack Kornfield, helped usher Buddhist thought into the therapy arena more than 20 years ago with his iconic book Thoughts Without a Thinker. Since then, he’s continued to publish to popular and professional acclaim and is celebrated for his writing exploring Buddhism and the psychologically vexing nature of the “self.” In his latest offering, Advice Not Given: A Guide to Getting Over Yourself, he overcomes his longstanding reluctance to make the case for Buddhist ideology and gives genuine guidance on how to reign in our troublesome egos.

I recently caught up with Epstein for an interview to hear how he first came to integrate Buddhism and therapy decades ago, and to find out more about how he sees this intersection of Eastern and Western thought playing out in our culture today.

- - - -

RH: How did you first learn about Buddhist practice?

EPSTEIN: When I was in college, Daniel Goleman, the author of Emotional Intelligence, was a grad…

Already have an account linked to your magazine subscription? Log in now to continue reading this article.

(Need help? Click here or contact us to ask a question.)

Not currently a subscriber? Subscribe Today to read the rest of this article!

Previous: Case Study
Next: Bookmarks

Read 17602 times
Comments - (existing users please login first)
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

1 Comment

Sunday, February 28, 2021 6:58:51 AM | posted by Richard Schwartz
I was enjoying this interview and agreeing with much of what Mark was saying until the end where he implies that parts artificial creations and that by identifying them, one shirks responsibility for oneself. My experience, and the experience of thousands of others, is that they are real subpersonalities and that denying their existence makes it harder to take responsibility for them and to work with them compassionately, rather than just observe them as is the case with mindfulness.