My Networker Login   |   
feed-60facebook-60twitter-60linkedin-60youtube-60
 

WEBCAST HIGHLIGHTS

Lighting the Spark in Teen Clients

Ron Taffel on Creating Conditions for Co ...

A New Way to Engage Teen Clients

Dan Siegel on the Power of the Teenage B ...

Defusing Male Shame

Understanding the Significance to Male C ...

WEBCAST COMMENTS

  • Liz Ann Clemens on Defusing Male Shame On my trip home none of the elders never uttered words of shame but merely watched me stoically. And, when ...
  • Daryl Clemens on Defusing Male Shame While I generally agree with the proposition that shame is detrimental in the consulting room, I have always been impressed ...
  • Suzanne M on Defusing Male Shame I am curious.Is you client from Mexico,of Mexican decent, US born or has he immigrated legally/illegally? Is "Mexican" how your ...
  • Kristina Cizmar, The Shame Lady on Defusing Male Shame The problem is that defining shame as some version of "I am bad" fits right in with the globalized ...
  • Daniel Even on Defusing Male Shame Shame is a human emotion. As such, in my opinion, it is neither "healthy" or "unhealthy". We all experience it ...

Hearts and Bones: Attachment and Sexuality with Susan Johnson

Attachment Theory in Practice: NP0028 – Session 3

Learn how new research about mating and bonding can contribute to your understand of what secure, integrated sexuality looks like. Join Susan Johnson as she explores sexual problems and how they can best be addressed with clients.

After the session, please let us know what you think. If you ever have any technical questions or issues, please feel free to email support@psychotherapynetworker.org.

Posted in CE Comments, NP0028: Attachment Theory in Practice | Tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Hearts and Bones: Attachment and Sexuality with Susan Johnson

  1. Magdalini Agrafioti says:

    I listened to Sue Johnson once more. I enjoy her presentation as she presents her theory by combining both research data and examples from her practice.
    i would love to hear more examples of her specific interventions in the right momement.

  2. James B says:

    Sue Johnson and EFT just make sense…by going to the attachment feelings and emotions behind “the problem”, creates empathic understanding, which creates the safety to be vulnerable. It seems that if we can connect at the level of our basic needs, and feel safe doing so, we can work through anything. Perhaps EFT should be part of international negotiations, too : )
    I’m so glad to learn about her work and how to bring this depth of connection to couples.

  3. Fiona Glover says:

    Sue Johnson’s interview provides much valuable information on the topic of sex and attachment. It’s put into perspective the case of a male client who was adopted as an infant and abused as a child. Needless to say his relationships in adult life have not been successful in spite of receiving years of counselling. I now see that EFCT techniques may offer him a lifeline to recovery.

  4. dgperms says:

    It does make so much sense and I can’t wait to learn more. I’ve wanted a better roadmap for going deeper with couples than the standard conflict/communication training. Sue was incredibly articulate and I learned a lot.

  5. Frances says:

    Once again I am wowed by Sue Johnson. EFT makes so much sense. Once trust is created, couples just naturally open up and let themselves be vulnerable with each other. I bought Sue’s books but am seriously considering attending one of her workshops when she comes to my city. Thank you for another excellent presentation.

  6. HI Magdelini – there are lots of specific suggestions in the literature – I would look at the article in JMFT a few years ago that I and Zuccarini wrote on sex and attachment. All articles and chapters are on the site – http://www.iceeft.com
    sue johnson

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>