Psychotherapy and the Affordable Care Act

Changes You Can Expect

Tori Rodriguez

CliniciansDigest_1-smFrom the time of its disastrous October 1 launch, news about the landmark Affordable Care Act (ACA), designed to extend healthcare coverage to millions of the country’s currently uninsured, has been overshadowed by the focus on its egregious website technical glitches. Now that the worst computer issues have begun to be addressed, more attention has turned to anticipating ACA’s actual impact on the delivery of healthcare, including the mental health services, which comprise one of the 10 essential health benefits payers must cover under the act. ACA’s expansion of the benefits of the Mental Health Parity and Addictions Equity Act of 2008 means that millions more people will receive mental health benefits, with the mandate that they must be reimbursed at the same level as coverage for physical illnesses. At first glance, that huge growth in the potential insured client pool would appear to be a boon for therapists in private practice, but ACA’s practical impact may not be as favorable as many clinicians expect.

In the interest of efficiency, increased oversight, and cost control, ACA will effect fundamental changes in the ways that healthcare is monitored and delivered. According to Katherine Nordal, American Psychological Association’s (APA) executive director for professional practice, ACA will move insurance companies away from fee-for-service models (paying one provider for one session) toward a global payment model, in which mental health services are “bundled” with fees for other healthcare services relevant to the patient’s condition. To decrease healthcare spending, the ACA emphasizes an increased focus on three areas: accountability for patient outcomes, with more responsibility placed on the provider to demonstrate effectiveness; greater reliance on outcome measures in evaluating treatment, such as patient satisfaction and symptom reduction; and value-based care models, designed to reduce the cost growth of healthcare. The increased demand for demonstrating positive outcomes will require more collaboration and technical infrastructure, including the increasing use of sophisticated (and expensive) electronic medical records systems.

Many believe that the likely result will be a trend in which insurance companies contract with large medical systems to form accountable care organizations (ACOs) that will provide all healthcare services (such as medical, mental health, pharmacy, and lab services) for all a given plan’s members in certain geographic areas. ACOs offer providers financial incentives for positive patient outcomes, and they’ll probably embrace the model of a patient-centered medical home, in which all care is funneled through a patient’s primary care physician. Therapists will need to be on staff to provide mental health triage and treatment in these collaborative settings, but they’ll enjoy far less of the autonomy embodied in the current private practice model. Clinicians working in these more collaborative and medicalized settings will need a different kind of training to enable them to see more patients in shorter sessions and adapt to increased interaction with physicians and other healthcare providers. With more centralized and coordinated oversight of treatment decisions, the increasing emphasis on providers using evidence-based treatment approaches will likely continue to accelerate.

Some observers believe that these changes in the healthcare system will transform the landscape of private practice in the years to come. According to Nick Cummings, a former president of the APA, noted for his prescience over the past 50 years in anticipating the advent of managed care and other practice trends, “It won’t happen right away, but private practice will essentially be a thing of the past, as 95 percent of practitioners will be on salary, either working in government-sponsored systems or large healthcare companies.” He says the remaining private practitioners will probably be based within concierge plans, which are typically expensive and accessible only to high-income patients. He believes that because of the glut of psychotherapists—about 700,000 therapists in the United States alone, twice as many as needed, he says—the prospects for therapists’ incomes are not bright.

In addition, psychotherapy will likely continue to take a back seat to psychiatry from the perspective of payers. “Under the ACA, mental health services will continue to be mostly psychotropic-prescribing psychiatry,” Cummings says. “Most psychotherapy that is referred will be secondary to medication—which is unfortunate because, in most cases, psychotherapy is less effective when used secondary to meds.” He says another unfortunate effect of ACA will be that “the psychotherapy that is done will be the vapid, less effective, cognitive-behavioral therapy, while active, deep, and incisive therapy that incorporates psychodynamics will all but disappear.”

Read the full Clinician's Digest articles, "Psychotherapy and the Affordable Care Act" and "Ecstasy in the Consulting Room," in the January/February 2014 issue of Psychotherapy Networker magazine.

Topic: Professional Development

Tags: ACA | Affordable Care Act | behavioral therapy | mental health | mental health services | psychotherapy | Tori Rodriguez

Comments - (existing users please login first)
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Saturday, November 7, 2015 12:10:17 PM | posted by URL
... [Trackback]

[...] Read More here: [...]

Saturday, November 8, 2014 9:24:19 PM | posted by american diabetes
When the cells lack insulin they become starved and since there is no other source
of energy apart from the fats, they get used up. When compared to diabetes rates in Caucasians, the risk of diabetes is
18 percent higher in Asian Americans. A person with diabetes has a higher risk factor of having a
heart attack.

Saturday, April 12, 2014 10:03:22 AM | posted by Therapist calls for ‘open, honest dialogues’ between various players in … | Mens H
[...] ‘ACOs’ and ‘Medical Homes’ are being looked at as a solution by insurance companies to providing [...]

Wednesday, March 5, 2014 12:37:14 AM | posted by Patrick O'Connor
For an early career psychologist like myself, who values deeply understanding clients and addressing the root causes of psychological distress, this article is quite painful.

Tuesday, March 4, 2014 7:22:19 PM | posted by ELIZABETH MOORE
Why so gloomy?

I am certainly not a Pollyanna but, after reading this article, I had some thoughts about why psychodynamic therapy may very well continue to be a valued and reimbursed service.

1. Consumers want mental health services but that doesn’t mean they’re willing to complete scale-rating forms ad nauseam or go to a busy medical clinic to do their psychological healing. When I first considered leaving the hospital setting and going into private practice, I talked with my mentor about doing additional certifications to market myself. She had been in private practice for 20+ years. She told me, “People don’t want that. They want to be understood, supported, and cared for. They want a therapeutic relationship.” From my work with people, I have found this to be true.

2. Consumers drive the market. Remember that the Mental Health Parity Act was a consumer-driven movement. We still live in a Capitalist economy and the “educated client,” as coined by Lynn Grodzki, is also an engaged, politically-savvy, Internet-connected consumer.

3. The basis for fulfilling human interactions is relational not transactional. No law can eradicate human nature (nor do I believe that is the intent of any law). Even large corporations understand this tenet. Salespeople are paid heartily for their ability to establish and maintain clients and they do it by creating relationships.

I am a psychiatric nurse practitioner with a private practice in Seattle, WA. I have also put together a quick-start guide for those considering private practice at: