My Networker Login   |   


Brain Integration as the Key to Mental Health

Dan Siegel Defines the Attributes of a H ...

Our Bottom Line Responsibility as Therapists

Rick Hanson on Working with the Brain fo ...

Helping Kids Find the Answers Inside

Charlotte Reznick on tapping into Imagin ...


  • kateposey on Brain Science I'm glad Siegel points out the mind brain duality, but his definition of mind (regulation of information and energy flow)is ...
  • lynnlampert on NP0047: Revitalize Your Practice Joe mentioned the importance of title tag but never defined what it was. Can we get more info on this. Lynn
  • katharyn on NP0047: Revitalize Your Practice I am so glad I decided to opt for this series. I was reticent as it seems "everyone" has ...
  • Lisa_703 on Emotion Thank you for putting together this panel, Rich. Very valuable. One critique that may improve on these interviews ...
  • kmartin89 on Tough Customers Loved Mitchell piece on resistance. Some great tools for my tool box; I loved the part about getting out of ...

SOA13 302 with Mary Jo Barrett and Dick Schwartz

Tell Us What You Think | Ask Questions | Get Feedback From Your Peers

How will what you heard today change the way you practice? Is there a particular technique you plan to try? Do you have specific questions for the presenter? Join the conversation!

If you have any technical questions or issues, please email

Posted in State of the Art 2013 Comments | Tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to SOA13 302 with Mary Jo Barrett and Dick Schwartz

  1. joystar says:

    I consider my own movement from a wounded healer to a healed healer, and that of my clients from survivors to empowered, free individuals, as a combination of understanding the suffering that is past and current, regaining energy previously frozen in repressed feelings that it has not been safe to experience and express, and changing the beliefs, feelings and behaviours that are a product of suffering so as to manifest something new, healthy, and functional in going forward. In other words there is an understanding of the processes of protection, resistance, hypervigilance, followed by courage to allow an emotional enema or catharsis, followed by inviting and allowing support and encouragement from others and self, followed by rescripting, reframing, positive self talk, self compassion so as to allow what is new to emerge.

  2. estherwong says:

    I appreciate the emphasis both Mary Jo and **** placed on assessing how safe it is at any point in treatment to approach the “raw trauma material” with a particular client. It is crucial to take into account and address the protective parts of the person’s self as well as the variety of contextual factors which might be continuously contributing to the individual’s vulnerability (including ongoing threats to safety within the family, community, etc.). The way in which **** talked about obtaining permission first from the protective parts of a person before addressing the difficult trauma material particularly resonated with me. Relatedly, I appreciate the manner in which both speakers considered how these elements should inform timing/pacing and (realistic) goals of intervention. Thank you both!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>