By Rich Simon As therapists, many of us practice in two different worlds. In the first, we see polite, well-behaved, articulate clients with solid values. They engage fully in therapy, talk cogently about their problems, listen attentively to our responses, make reasonably good-faith efforts to follow our suggestions, and sooner or later get better. No wonder we genuinely like these people!
Requested page not available (because user or community was deleted)P004, Attachment, Bonus Session, Ed TronickThank you for your participation in our New Perspectives on Practice Series, “The Great Attachment Debate.” These six sessions will cover a wide range of viewpoints on attachment theory and research and how the role of attachment theory in the consulting room. For our Bonus Session, “What Therapists Should Know about Human Development,” development researcher Ed Tronick will join us to discuss development, attachment, and psychotherapy. After listening, please take a few minutes to comment about what’s most interesting to you so far throughout this webinar series, what stood out to you the most after Ed Tronick’s Bonus Session, and to ask any questions you may have. We invite you to include your name and hometown to continue creating a sense of community and to read and respond to others’ comments and questions. Comments |
I often think messiness is a key concept. We all as therapists want to do so well and often we see that as 'orderly" and "clean" rather than involving the give and take that over time leads to emergence of new meanings. I also think that sometimes one level is really in fanct 'messed up" such as the explicit (which we hang on to so much) and other levels (physiology or micro communicative patterns) are infact moving forward.