Welcome to our
“Who’s Afraid of Couples Therapy?” This exciting series, back by popular demand, is based on our November/December 2011 issue on this topic and will explore the challenges of couples work.
What are the most effective strategies in working with couples? How can therapists structure therapy—particularly in the early sessions—so that couples leave with a sense of hope, rather than frustration? Can working with individuals who have serious issues in their relationships actually be detrimental to them? Find out the answers to these questions and much more. In this first session with expert couples therapists
Ellyn Bader and Peter Pearson, the creators of the Developmental Model of Couples Therapy, you’ll find out why clinicians often avoid working with couples and how you can better prepare yourself for couples therapy work.
How can therapists most effectively work with emotion in the consulting room—particularly when it comes to couples therapy? Learn with internationally known couples therapist
Hedy Schleifer how to help create a nourishing connection between partners, define a role as therapist-as-guide, and much more. Schleifer, who’s pioneered the training of Imago Relationship therapists internationally, will go into how to use this theory in practice and how to best work with emotions.
What happens when partners in couples therapy have two different agendas in mind? Hear from expert
William Doherty on this little spoken about topic. Learn how Discernment Counseling, an approach that helps couples clarify their feelings about the next step in their relationship, can help both clients and therapists.
Is it possible to rebuild trust and intimacy in a couple’s relationship after a partner has had an affair? How can therapists help? Hear from
Esther Perel, author of the international bestseller Mating in Captivity: Unlocking Erotic Intelligence, on how to help couples after an infidelity and the role that cultural perspectives have in this emotional situation.
Explore this classic dynamic of couples therapy—an angry woman and a withdrawn man—that’s often confusing for therapists, with couples therapist
Jette Simon. Learn more about what’s behind the feelings of anger and the behavior of withdrawing, and how clinicians can more effectively work with shame and fear of disconnection.
Hear an unconventional perspective on couples therapy from
David Schnarch, who believes that the best way to help couples is to challenge partners to change their individual behaviors and attitudes. Schnarch’s direct, upfront approach to helping clients will illustrate a different viewpoint on effective couples therapy.
Join
Marty Klein, a marriage and family therapist and certified sex therapist, us for a candid discussion about the assumptions that both clients and therapists often share that can get in the way of improving couples’ sexual relationships.
Discover with
Kathryn Rheem how to respond effectively when clients express strong feelings in session. Based on Emotionally Focused Therapy, you’ll explore attunement and how to use your own emotions to help clients move beyond attachment injuries.
After the session, please let us know what you think. If you ever have any
technical questions or issues, please feel free to email
support@psychotherapynetworker.org.
My question is regarding the grandiose partner or latent vs blatant. I find that some people appear to be victims while they are victimizing, or are "latent blatants." What are some more ways of detecting who is the blatant? Also, I am seeing more women who are coming across as blatant or grandiose. I sometimes get confused when so much information comes out during that 1 session or so. Also I see many men who are doing the initial calling because they can't get their wife to come in for therapy. She's usually very angry by that point and already has one foot out the door.
2- WE TEACH SEVERAL CLASSES ON GRANDIOSE WOMEN - A LOT TO SAY THERE. TOO MUCH FOR THIS LITTLE SPACE.
What stood out for me is the idea of eschewing the development of a warm fuzzy alliance with the use of leverage. The trick as is made clear later in the presentation is to use the leverage and still maintain a degree of engagement.
The other thought I had was how the use of the term "grandiosity" might be compared to Nagy's idea of "entitlement"? A lot of partners seem to have a sense of entitlement but I wouldn't necessarily compare their sense of entitlement as being grandiose although there are certain partners who have a grandiose sense of entitlement.
I wonder if Mr. Real could comment on entitlement and how, if at all, this element is dealt with in his RLT?
Thanks for a great presentation,
David Markham, L.C.S.W. - R
Brockport, NY
Jenny..
MACHO MEN HAVE ALREADY BROKEN WITH TRADITION BY SEEING A THERAPIST. THE OLD DAYS ARE OVER - THAY NEED TO ADAPT TO TODAY.
--Stephanie Bates, LCSW
All that said, I really appreciate what Terry had to say and will definitely explore the website. I hope that, given more time and/or a different format (articles, books) working with diverse couples would also be addressed. Thanks for the encouragement!
A question I have for Terry is: What do you say to a couple in which the 'ragant' (sp?) refuses to acknowledge and/or is unwilling to take responsibility for their portion of the 'dance' that takes place between the couple?
as a semi-retired practioner appreciate the opportunity to see it after its original presentation.
One comment--I see many remarks about poor sound quality for Terry--I am baffled by that. I had no difficulty hearing/understanding what he was saying.
One more comment about Rich's contributions. I understand his role as moderator, and appreciate that, but I do find that his clarifications are sometimes intrusive and go on too long. We actually do get it; we don't always need a translator to understand what is being said. So--more presenter, less Rich, please.