By Rich Simon It seems astonishing that even just two or three decades ago, parents not only pretty much knew what was expected of them to turn their offspring into civilized adults, but they could actually count on society to back them up. Even more astounding, kids seemed to understand this, too. Even if they rebelled against, yelled about, or sullenly resented how “unfair” adults were, they seemed to acknowledge adult authority and realize that they would just have to wait until they turned 18 to get for themselves the keys to the kingdom of grown-up independence.
![]() NP006 Couples Therapy: Today and TomorrowThis blog focuses on discussion regarding the course, NP006 Couples Therapy: Today and TomorrowNP006, Couples, Session 2, Terry RealWelcome to the second session in Couples Therapy Today and Tomorrow—“The New Rules of 21st-Century Marriage: Toughness, Truth, and Tenderness” with relationship and gender expert Terry Real. In this session, he’ll discuss how to help couples develop the skills necessary to achieve the high level of connection and emotional intimacy that many desire. He’ll go over how to deal with the differences between what men and women bring to relationships, how to identify that strategies that disrupt relationships, how to present blunt truths, and much more. We encourage you to use the Comment Board as a way to engage with each other and the presenters in this course, to share what you felt was most interesting, to ask any questions you may have, and to reflect on what you’ve learned. What was most relevant for you in this session with Terry Real? Comments |
My question is regarding the grandiose partner or latent vs blatant. I find that some people appear to be victims while they are victimizing, or are "latent blatants." What are some more ways of detecting who is the blatant? Also, I am seeing more women who are coming across as blatant or grandiose. I sometimes get confused when so much information comes out during that 1 session or so. Also I see many men who are doing the initial calling because they can't get their wife to come in for therapy. She's usually very angry by that point and already has one foot out the door.
2- WE TEACH SEVERAL CLASSES ON GRANDIOSE WOMEN - A LOT TO SAY THERE. TOO MUCH FOR THIS LITTLE SPACE.
What stood out for me is the idea of eschewing the development of a warm fuzzy alliance with the use of leverage. The trick as is made clear later in the presentation is to use the leverage and still maintain a degree of engagement.
The other thought I had was how the use of the term "grandiosity" might be compared to Nagy's idea of "entitlement"? A lot of partners seem to have a sense of entitlement but I wouldn't necessarily compare their sense of entitlement as being grandiose although there are certain partners who have a grandiose sense of entitlement.
I wonder if Mr. Real could comment on entitlement and how, if at all, this element is dealt with in his RLT?
Thanks for a great presentation,
David Markham, L.C.S.W. - R
Brockport, NY
Jenny..
MACHO MEN HAVE ALREADY BROKEN WITH TRADITION BY SEEING A THERAPIST. THE OLD DAYS ARE OVER - THAY NEED TO ADAPT TO TODAY.
--Stephanie Bates, LCSW
All that said, I really appreciate what Terry had to say and will definitely explore the website. I hope that, given more time and/or a different format (articles, books) working with diverse couples would also be addressed. Thanks for the encouragement!
A question I have for Terry is: What do you say to a couple in which the 'ragant' (sp?) refuses to acknowledge and/or is unwilling to take responsibility for their portion of the 'dance' that takes place between the couple?
as a semi-retired practioner appreciate the opportunity to see it after its original presentation.
One comment--I see many remarks about poor sound quality for Terry--I am baffled by that. I had no difficulty hearing/understanding what he was saying.
One more comment about Rich's contributions. I understand his role as moderator, and appreciate that, but I do find that his clarifications are sometimes intrusive and go on too long. We actually do get it; we don't always need a translator to understand what is being said. So--more presenter, less Rich, please.