By Rich Simon As therapists, many of us practice in two different worlds. In the first, we see polite, well-behaved, articulate clients with solid values. They engage fully in therapy, talk cogently about their problems, listen attentively to our responses, make reasonably good-faith efforts to follow our suggestions, and sooner or later get better. No wonder we genuinely like these people!
NETWORKER EXCHANGEThe Decline of Big Pharma and the Rediscovering of PsychotherapyAn article in the December Archives of General Psychiatry just reported that only 43 percent of people who sought treatment for depression went to a psychotherapist. This is part of a larger trend over the past couple of decades that has seen the number of people referred for therapy by physicians drop nearly 50 percent.
Today, physicians dispensing meds are the main source of treatment for most depressed people. At the same time, there’s increasing evidence that Cognitive-Behavioral approaches--along with other forms of psychotherapy--work at least as effectively as meds for many clients, and have no side effects.
Curious about the latest therapeutic advances in working with depression? Here are a few useful resources you might want to check out. In “Deconstructing Depression,” featured in the November/December 2010 issue, Peg Wehrenberg distinguishes between four very different varieties of depression--neurobiological, traumatic, situational, and attachment-related--that are currently lumped together by DSM-IV. This coming March at the 2011 Networker Symposium, she’ll also offer a workshop called “The Ten Best-Ever Depression Management Techniques,” demonstrating how to best match treatment with a client’s specific form of depression. Starting January 7, Michael Yapko will be giving a webinar, “Beyond Pills: Effective Therapy with Depressed Clients,” which not only surveys the empirically-supported treatments for depression, but also explores how hypnosis and mindfulness practice can enhance accepted psychotherapeutic methods. As part of the webinar, he’ll be presenting a clinical video demonstration. Please let us know your questions--as well as what you’ve seen from your own experiences--about what works and what doesn’t when treating depression. Comments |
The withdrawal from Cymbalta and Xanax and some of the others after long-term use can be extremely daunting. And I am quite dismayed at the heavy-handed use of meds by the military and some psychiatrists, particularly in the treatment of anxiety disorders. Some of the people in my organization are on chemical cocktails so heavy (5+ medications) that they have trouble functioning--and I cannot see how CBT or any type of therapy is helping them when they are doped up, overweight, and overmedicated.
So, short term, in order to enhance and expedite talk therapy is great. Long term and heavy doses--no.
Thank you for this forum,
Colleen M. Crary, M.A.
Fearless Nation PTSD Support
www.fearless-nation.org
I've used neurofeedback in conjunction with therapy very successfully to treat depression in both adults and teens. Certain patterns of electrical activity are associated with depression, and neurofeedback can often be used to alter that pattern, dramatically reducing the time needed to successfully treat depression. Typically in depression we see left frontal slowing. I've been using neurofeedback in my little corner of a large public agency for over 5 years, and it has become a permanent part of my therapeutic toolbox.
In other words, therapy works no better than a placebo? Because that's what's been repeatedly demonstrated in recent studies about medications (except in cases at the outset of severe clinical depression). Actually, it's what Big Pharma knew all along and, with the cooperation of the American Psychiatric Association, kept hidden.
It's almost shocking to see this come up for discussion without mention of Robert Whitaker's recent book, "Anatomy of an Epidemic: Magic Bullets, Psychiatric Drugs, and the Astonishing Rise of Mental Illness in America." It's not an alarmist screed by a conspiracy theorist. It's based on empirical evidence: In cultures that don't resort to long-term use of psychotropic drugs, recovery rates are much higher.
Every therapist should read it.
I say this as both a therapist and a person who has been on antidepressants for 20 years. During my initial use, they made a remarkable change for me -- saved my life, in fact. But they have done nothing for me in years. But trying to get off them is a nightmare. Whitaker produces evidence that this is so because the drugs permanently alter the brain's structure.
There is a talk by Ken Robinson on the website RSA.com, "Changing the Paradigm of Education". In it he says that we are drugging our children, and he shows a map of where ADD is prevalent. Children live in the most stimulating times ever and we ask them to sit in schools for far too many hours and pay attention to boring work. When they can't sit still we deem their behavior a problem and medicate them. Is the same thing happening with depression?
I will suggest that the field of psychology needs to change it paradigm as well. The advent of Neuroscience will at some point incorporate psychology. Far too many mental illness may not be illnesses at all. As Howard Gardner suggested 20 or more years ago, we are all differently oriented, we are not the same. We must begin to understand others as we now understand people with different sexual orientations, which was also once a diagnosed "illness." The is not psychology which needs treatment, but social psychology which needs educating.
One thing seems certain, if we react to someone as if they're behavior is the problem it will be.
T A Hoppe dustproduction@gmail.com
Marie
We need to educate the parents that these doctors have no actual knowledge of their child’s brain chemistry nor do they generally observe the behaviors they are treating - the parent’s reports are the only measuring instrument. They should be very assertive – but these are often poorly educated people dealing with a “medical expert”. Often times, of course, the parent’s own issues (as is true with all us parents) create distortions about a child and these are treated as literal facts by the psychiatrists. The rash diagnostic conclusions drawn from such parental reports by physicians would sometimes make for good humor, were it not impacting real kids.
One child about to turn 18, issued a chilling statement. Approximately: “I can’t wait until my 18th birthday, so for the first time that I can remember; I can experience the world un- medicated.”
If so, thanks.
Having worked with these populations in a variety of settings, I could rail with the best of them at the failure of the systems that are designed to care for these individuals and, instead, suck them dry and further deprive them of hope for anything better. And I could declare with absolute certainty that most meds are over prescribed and create dependency and often further disable clients because of their side effects.
Or, I can tell you that these individuals are my heroes. They get up every day and come together in programs where they form, on however limited a basis, community. I laughed with them, I cried with them and I hope I supported their process. I gave them my presence and shared theirs, to the extent that it was possible to do so. We shared human contact. Anything else was mere happenstance and, possibly, ego (mine!).
I can also tell you that, no matter my skills and good intentions, none of them would ever attain what we might describe as "wellness." And few if any could have even begun to consider such concepts as "cause" and "effect" as it might have related to their current condition.
So, when we speak of helping our depressed and otherwise mentally ill clients, we must first be prepared to be present with them and hope that they will come to trust us enough to let us in. Their world is not like ours and, when invited in, we must be gracious guests. When someone is 7'5" tall, my telling him/her to think short thoughts is meaningless, to say nothing of useless, especially if the only entrance into my purportedly normal (and thereby desireable) world is designed for people no larger than 3'2" in height. In my experience, depressed patients do better in group therapy than in individual therapy. They don't need to feel sick so much as they need to find/form community.
When clients show up, that tells me they are motivated. It is possible that meds will be helpful, or not. Unless they want meds, I am willing to work with them as is. Is this always successful? No. But it's a place of beginning and that is crucial. Once the client engages, then it may be possible to consider other potential treatment options.
Unless my client represents harm to self or others, I am not the decider about my client's decisions. At best, my input may be sought and considered. My task is to create and maintain an airspace, a cushion of relative comfort, a sacred space where the client can think, reflect, consider and make decisions for him/herself.
On a good day (and I've had some), this approach works well for me.
Caryn, Oxnard, CA
Jennifer Sneeden, LMFT
Boca Raton Therapist
www.jennifersneeden.com
Re: depression---if it is clinical (chemical) then medication can be extremely helpful (or if it is major depression with psychotic features then why would meds be withheld?) And why would meds be withheld except in the worst case scenarios? Sometimes meds are pretty much all that's needed (after education about these meds and the clinical depression is discussed--short term supportive therapy), sometimes meds and a lot of psychotherapy are both needed, sometimes meds and CBT are the ticket, or psychotherapy alone, etc.
If the diagnostics are off, then the treatment will be also. What bothers me today is that with the fragmentation of care, I think the diagnostics are quite often off. Then it doesn't matter what is done, it won't be of help in the way it can be.
Just tossing scripts at patients can be a problem, doing only psychotherapy (and being married to that position) or only CBT can all be problematic, I think.
I've seen unipolar and bipolar depression be misdiagnosed as schizophrenia or borderline, I've seen meds given when they weren't needed and another type treatment was, I've seen CBT used only when the practitioner is versed just in that treatment or mainly in that treatment, I've seen patients in psychotherapy who were classic ADHD who did need meds go without them for far too long, spending too much time and money in psychotherapy.
The bottom line to me is being a top-rate diagnostician first and foremost. If that not gotten right, then forget the whole thing. If the diagnostics are right (or close as they can be at this time) and an integrative approach is taken, then we all do better.
To say that "no medication can provide that" and (re: skills so "they can learn to live again" seems to miss the point I made earlier---the brain is just as "medical" as the knee, as the heart, as the kidney, liver, etc.--it's the executive center!
Who would tell a person who has a severed ACL in their knee to cope with it by walking more slowly, by avoiding sports, never skiing again, etc? For that's what it would take and this could be done. If someone is adamantly opposed to surgery they can limit themselves and NOT have an ACL reconstruction. If an ACL replacement IS done (which involves surgery which we all know is high risk--surgery always is) then all of the activities that were done previously can be done again---there need not be coping skills "taught" where a person has to learn how to live again with a ruptured ACL in their knee. I watched my husband at age 40 try to do just this as his doctor said...that he was too "old" to require an ACL reconstruction (ie, he was not a professional athlete, etc.) This was all bunk. My husband had an ACL reconstruction with PT after and within a year could do anything he could do before, to include running, skiing, tennis, etc. without his knee going out on him.
I think we sell our patients short (or border on malpractice) when we don't give them the option of medication when the medication will treat a medical mental illness. This said, I think there are many therapies and a reason for that. But we do best to be wise and not married to any one pet theory or treatment---or we might treat our patients poorly and short-change them.
Again, I fear that diagnostics are not being taught in an integrative way anymore. Clinical major depression, unipolar and bipolar depression are NOT "sadness"or coping problems, and are not due to a "lack of coping skills"---clinical depression is a medical illness and deserves the right to be recognized as such! If you get pneumonia you don't want to be instructed in "how to breathe."
The thing I've found as shocking as the willingness of GP docs to prescribe meds without referring to therapists (which IS shocking) and the lack of adequate support from MDs in helping to get people OFF the meds, is the lack of awareness by both MDs and licensed therapists to the many physiological dimensions that underlie depression. How many docs or therapists take adequate histories -- including family history (not just of mood disorders), diet, exercise, supplement regimes, general knowledge about preventative self-care? How many are aware of the potential for a wide range of medical conditions to produce mood disorders well beyond hypothyroidism and pituitary tumors? Adrenal fatigue, CFS/fibro, a range of post-viral symptoms, chronic inflammation, hypertension, leaky gut, perimenopause, etc etc are chronic multi-system conditions that are still often misdiagnosed and then treated as primarily mood disorders. The mitochondrial dysfunction that is increasingly understood as underlying many of these conditions simultaneously messes with neurotransmitters, most of which are produced in the gut (how many therapists inquire as to gut health of their clients?). How many psychs or therapists are prepared to refer to a good nutritionist, for example? Or to recommend cortisol/hormone/neurotransmitter level testing? Or to refer to a good functional medicine doc who is prepared to take some time to look at the whole person?
Even as therapists we are often still not looking at the whole person when we talk about depression; much of our language still engages in this mind/body separation that doesn't make much sense anymore. I really don't believe that depression and anxiety are primarily a "lack of coping skills" unless coping skills are understood also in terms of what biological resources the person has had to bring and can bring to ongoing stress. Coping in the face of stress, in other words, is not primarily or just a cognitive process. The body/mind's life-long stress load and its current capacity to "cope" with stress has to be looked at in a systemic way, well beyond I believe what current models of CBT (or many other modes of talk therapy) provide.
I think our whole health care delivery system is so ill equipped to deal with the multi-system stress-mediated disorders of which depression and anxiety are a part. So it's left to exhausted, unhappy and stressed out individuals to piece together systems of care where the care-delivery clinicians don't speak to each other or even speak the same language or have the same conception of diagnosis, treatment, or recovery. Let's hope this is all changing for the better.
(ps - I am a clinical social worker, with 25+ years experience as a therapist, and a lifetime struggle with depression; all modes of treatment welcome.)